Monty Python's Intel

Intel: The Commission consistently construed ambiguous documents in a manner adverse to Intel.

Interviewer: What about the emails from Intel employees?

Intel: Yes but ignoring those, they have no clear evidence.

Interviewer: What about the email from PC manufacturers’ employees?

Intel: Well, we’re ignoring those too.

Interviewer: And the retailers?

Intel: We don’t listen to retailers.

Interviewer: And all the memos?

Intel: Yes but besides the emails from us and the PC manufacturers, evidence from retailers and the memos they have, there’s really no support whatsoever for their side of this case.

Interviewer: What about the secret conversations?

Intel: Secret conversations! What else you got?

Interviewer: And what about the two previous findings against Intel in Japan and Korea?

Intel: Now listen clearly. If you ignore the emails, evidence from retailers, memos, secret conversations and the findings from a majority of the civilized world, I think we can all agree their evidence is “insufficiently clear”.

Monty Python’s Intel | Nigel Dessau

Haha klockrent. Ja undra hur det kommer gå för Intel. Dom har väl fortfarande en massa stämmningar hängande över sig trots förlikningen med AMD?

Ursprungligen postat av Swedish Berserk

Haha klockrent. Ja undra hur det kommer gå för Intel. Dom har väl fortfarande en massa stämmningar hängande över sig trots förlikningen med AMD?

USA:s Handelskommission ska dra igång med sin rättegång senare i år tror ja väl